4.7 Article

Negative argininosuccinate synthetase expression in melanoma tumours may predict clinical benefit from arginine-depleting therapy with pegylated arginine deiminase

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 106, Issue 9, Pages 1481-1485

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.106

Keywords

melanoma; arginine; arginine deiminase

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA109578]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Arginine-depleting therapy with pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20) was reported to have activity in advanced melanoma in early phase I-II trial, and clinical trials are currently underway in other cancers. However, the optimal patient population who benefit from this treatment is unknown. METHODS: Advanced melanoma patients with accessible tumours had biopsy performed before the start of treatment with ADI-PEG20 and at the time of progression or relapse when amenable to determine whether argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) expression in tumour was predictive of response to ADI-PEG20. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of thirty-eight patients treated had melanoma tumours assessable for ASS staining before treatment. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) and longer time to progression were associated with negative expression of tumour ASS. Only 1 of 10 patients with ASS-positive tumours (ASS+) had stable disease, whereas 4 of 17 (24%) had partial response and 5 had stable disease, when ASS expression was negative (ASS-), giving CBR rates of 52.9 vs 10%, P = 0.041. Two responding patients with negative ASS expression before therapy had rebiopsy after tumour progression and the ASS expression became positive. The survival of ASS - patients receiving at least four doses at 320 IUm(-2) was significantly better than the ASS+ group at 26.5 vs 8.5 months, P = 0.024. CONCLUSION: ADI-PEG20 is safe and the drug is only efficacious in melanoma patients whose tumour has negative ASS expression. Argininosuccinate synthetase tumour positivity is associated with drug resistance and tumour progression. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 106, 1481-1485. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.106 www.bjcancer.com Published online 3 April 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available