4.7 Article

Normal tissues toxicities triggered by combined anti-angiogenic and radiation therapies: hurdles might be ahead

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages 308-314

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.236

Keywords

anti-VEGF antibody; radiation; toxicity

Categories

Funding

  1. ARC funding [4970]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Combined-modality therapy is a promising approach to improve the therapeutic index of radiotherapy. However, these improvements could come at the cost of increased toxicities. Clinical trials evaluating anti-tumour efficacy of bevacizumab combined with radiotherapy have encountered unexpected side effects. This study is the first systematic evaluation of normal tissue toxicity triggered by anti-angiogenic agents combined with radiation therapy in mice. METHODS: Effect of a mouse anti-VEGF antibody was monitored on acute toxicity studying radiation-induced intestinal ulceration (12 Gy TBI); on subacute toxicity using a model of oral mucositis (16.5 Gy); on late radiation injuries by monitoring lung fibrosis (bleomycin and 19 Gy). RESULTS: Combination of irradiation with anti-VEGF antibody enhanced intestinal damages with severe epithelial ulcerations, had no adverse impact on oral mucositis and dramatically worsened the fibrotic picture induced by bleomycin and irradiation to the lung. INTERPRETATION: These reports bring to light the important questions about safety and underscore the need for appropriate preclinical modelling of the impact on normal tissues of novel drug-radiation regimens. Our findings also highlight the complexity of anti-VEGF action, which could in defined conditions exert tissue-specific protection. The findings indicate that the combination of targeted drugs with radiotherapy should be approached with caution. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 308-314. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.236 www.bjcancer.com Published online 12 June 2012 (c) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available