Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A Population-Based Assessment of Specialty Physician Involvement in Cancer Clinical Trials
Carrie N. Klabunde et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2011)
Continental Divide? The Attitudes of US and Canadian Oncologists on the Costs, Cost-Effectiveness, and Health Policies Associated With New Cancer Drugs
Scott R. Berry et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2010)
Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: An observational study
Julia V. Cook et al.
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2009)
Follow-up care for cancer survivors: the views of clinicians
D. M. Greenfield et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2009)
How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians
C. Thorpe et al.
FAMILY PRACTICE (2009)
Survey Design in Orthopaedic Surgery: Getting Surgeons to Respond
Sheila Sprague et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2009)
Money talks: non-monetary incentive and Internet administration fail to increase response rates to a physician survey
Christopher J. Recklitis et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Primary Care Physicians' Views of Routine Follow-Up Care of Cancer Survivors
M. Elisabeth Del Giudice et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2009)
Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians
Frances J. Drummond et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates
Nancy L. Keating et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2008)
Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians - A systematic review
Jonathan B. VanGeest et al.
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS (2007)
Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians
Timothy J. Beebe et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2007)
Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians
Emily McFarlane et al.
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS (2007)
Medical oncologists' views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: A pilot survey
Deborah Schrag et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2007)
Print format and sender recognition were related to survey completion rate
Jamie C. Brehaut et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial
JS Hocking et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Effect on survey response rate of hand written versus printed signature on a covering letter: randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN67566265]
K McKenzie-McHarg et al.
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2005)
Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates
J Robertson et al.
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY (2005)
Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians
WL Cull et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2005)
In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate
C Jepson et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)
Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive
CD Delnevo et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2004)
Surveying general practitioners: a new avenue
M Jiwa et al.
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION (2004)
Prepayment was superior to postpayment cash incentives in a randomized postal survey among physicians
GM Leung et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2004)
Short report: Encouraging GPs to complete postal questionnaires-one big prize or many small prizes? A randomized controlled trial
CE Thomson et al.
FAMILY PRACTICE (2004)
Effect of prize draw incentive on the response rate to a postal survey of obstetricians and gynaecologists: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32823119]
SH Moses et al.
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2004)
In Canada, anesthesiologists are less likely to respond to an electronic, compared to a paper questionnaire
EG VanDenKerkhof et al.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE (2004)
Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?
D Braithwaite et al.
FAMILY PRACTICE (2003)
A randomized trial of opinion leader endorsement in a survey of orthopaedic surgeons: effect on primary response rates
M Bhandari et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2003)
Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians
SR McMahon et al.
PEDIATRICS (2003)
Randomized trial of $5 versus $10 monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires
SD Halpern et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2002)
The effects of cash and lottery incentives on mailed surveys to physicians - A randomized trial
GM Leung et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2002)
Surveying physicians - Do components of the Total Design Approach to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians?
TS Field et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2002)
Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs
S Barclay et al.
FAMILY PRACTICE (2002)
E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs
DB Raziano et al.
GERONTOLOGIST (2001)
Provision of pen along with questionnaire does not increase the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial
TJ Clark et al.
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2001)
Will donations to their learned college increase surgeons' participation in surveys? A randomized trial
M Gattellari et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2001)
A mail survey of United States hematologists and oncologists: A comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes
MB Streiff et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2001)
Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey
G Baron et al.
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS (2001)
Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians
JB VanGeest et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2001)
Physician response to surveys - A review of the literature
SE Kellerman et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2001)
Share Paper
