4.7 Article

A replicated association between polymorphisms near TNFα and risk for adverse reactions to radiotherapy

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages 748-753

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.290

Keywords

breast cancer; normal tissue radiation injury; genetics; tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha)

Categories

Funding

  1. Breast Cancer Campaign (UK)
  2. Deutsche Krebshilfe eV
  3. Dietmar Hopp Stiftung (Germany)
  4. Office for Radiation Protection in Germany
  5. Cancer Research UK
  6. Manchester Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
  7. NHS
  8. National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Response to radiotherapy varies between individuals both in terms of efficacy and adverse reactions. Finding genetic determinants of radiation response would allow the tailoring of the treatment, either by altering the radiation dose or by surgery. Despite a growing number of studies in radiogenomics, there are no well-replicated genetic association results. METHODS: We carried out a candidate gene association study and replicated the result using three additional large cohorts, a total of 2036 women scored for adverse reactions to radiotherapy for breast cancer. RESULTS: Genetic variation near the tumour necrosis factor alpha gene is shown to affect several clinical endpoints including breast induration, telangiectasia and overall toxicity. In the combined analysis homozygosity for the rare allele increases overall toxicity (P = 0.001) and chance of being in the upper quartile of risk with odds ratio of 2.46 (95% confidence interval 1.52-3.98). CONCLUSION: We have identified that alleles of the class III major histocompatibility complex region associate with overall radiotherapy toxicity in breast cancer patients by using internal replication through a staged design. This is the first well-replicated report of a genetic predictor for radiotherapy reactions. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 748-753. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.290 www.bjcancer.com Published online 5 July 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available