4.7 Article

Anti-tumour activity of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in human pancreatic tumour cells

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages 1554-1562

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.396

Keywords

afatinib; erlotinib; ICR62; pancreatic cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Kingston University London
  2. Ralph Bates Pancreatic Cancer Research fund
  3. Cancer Vaccine Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The combination of the reversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib with gemcitabine obtained FDA approval for treating patients with pancreatic cancer. However, duration of response is often limited and there is currently no reliable predictive marker. METHODS: We determined the sensitivity of a panel of human pancreatic tumour cell lines to treatment with afatinib, erlotinib, monoclonal antibody (mAb) ICR62, and gemcitabine, using the Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay. The effect of these agents on cell signalling and cell-cycle distribution was determined by western blot and flow cytometry, respectively. RESULTS: At 200 nM, ICR62 had no effect on growth of these tumour cells with the exception of BxPC-3 cells. BxPC-3 cells were also sensitive to treatment with afatinib and erlotinib with respective IC50 values of 11 and 1200 nM. Compared with erlotinib, afatinib was also more effective in inhibiting the growth of the other human pancreatic tumour cell lines and in blocking the EGF-induced phosphorylation of tyrosine, EGFR, MAPK, and AKT. When tested in BxPC-3 xenografts, afatinib induced significant delay in tumour growth. CONCLUSION: The superiority of afatinib in this study encourages further investigation on the therapeutic potential of afatinib as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1554-1562. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.396 www.bjcancer.com Published online 4 October 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available