4.7 Article

Phase I study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat in combination with 13-cis retinoic acid in patients with solid tumours

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 77-84

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.527

Keywords

histone deacetylase inhibitor; retinoic acid receptor; solid tumours

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI-CTEP
  2. The Maryland Cigarette Restitution Research Fund
  3. The Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
  4. The Translational Research Initiative CTEP-NCI
  5. The Analytical Pharmacology Core of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Johns Hopkins [P30 CA006973, U01 CA 70095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest that histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors may restore tumour sensitivity to retinoids. The objective of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability, and the pharmacokinetic (PK)/ pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of the HDAC inhibitor entinostat in combination with 13-cis retinoic acid (CRA) in patients with solid tumours. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated with entinostat orally once weekly and with CRA orally twice daily x 3 weeks every 4 weeks. The starting dose for entinostat was 4 mgm(-2) with a fixed dose of CRA at 1 mg kg(-1) per day. Entinostat dose was escalated by 1mgm(-2) increments. Pharmacokinetic concentrations of entinostat and CRA were determined by LC/MS/MS. Western blot analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumour samples were performed to evaluate target inhibition. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were enroled. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was exceeded at the entinostat 5 mgm(-2) dose level (G3 hyponatremia, neutropenia, and anaemia). Fatigue (G1 or G2) was a common side effect. Entinostat exhibited substantial variability in clearance (147%) and exposure. CRA trough concentrations were consistent with prior reports. No objective responses were observed, however, prolonged stable disease occurred in patients with prostate, pancreatic, and kidney cancer. Data further showed increased tumour histone acetylation and decreased phosphorylated ERK protein expression. CONCLUSION: The combination of entinostat with CRA was reasonably well tolerated. The recommended phase II doses are entinostat 4 mgm(-2) once weekly and CRA 1mg kg(-1) per day. Although no tumour responses were seen, further evaluation of this combination is warranted. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 106, 77-84. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.527 www.bjcancer.com Published online 1 December 2011 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available