4.7 Article

Smoking as an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Singapore Chinese Health Study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages 1430-1435

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.360

Keywords

smoking; hepatocellular carcinoma; alcohol drinking; viral hepatitis; prospective cohort; Chinese

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-CA55069, R35-CA53890, R01-CA80205, R01-CA98497]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Given the close correlation between smoking and alcohol intake in most epidemiologic studies, it is difficult to exclude the residual confounding effect of alcohol in the association between smoking and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHOD: We evaluated the association between smoking and risk of HCC in the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a prospective cohort with a low prevalence of alcohol intake. Information on cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption was obtained through in-person interviews conducted at enrolment. RESULTS: After a mean of 11.5 years of follow-up, there were 394 incident cases of HCC. Participants who consumed more than two alcoholic drinks per day showed an increased risk for HCC (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.46-3.41). After adjusting for alcohol consumption and other potential confounders, current vs never smokers had a statistically significant, increased risk of HCC (HR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.27-2.10) that was dose-dependent (number of cigarettes per day, P for trend <0.001). The observed tobacco-HCC association also was duration-dependent (years of smoking in ever smokers, P for trend = 0.002). When we excluded daily drinkers from the analysis, all risk estimates remained essentially the same and statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our findings strongly implicate tobacco smoke as a causal factor of HCC development. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1430-1435. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.360 www.bjcancer.com Published online 13 September 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available