4.7 Article

The role of Cathepsin S as a marker of prognosis and predictor of chemotherapy benefit in adjuvant CRC: a pilot study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages 1487-1494

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.408

Keywords

Cathepsin S; colorectal cancer; predictive; prognostic; recurrence-free survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Wyeth Ltd
  2. Friends of Montgomery House
  3. RCSI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot retrospective study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of Cathepsin S (CatS) in three cohorts of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n = 560). METHODS: Prevalence and association with histopathological variables were assessed across all cohorts. Association with clinical outcomes was investigated in the Northern Ireland Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial cohort (n = 211), where stage II/III CRC patients were randomised between surgery-alone or surgery with adjuvant fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) treatment. RESULTS: Greater than 95% of tumours had detectable CatS expression with significantly increased staining in tumours compared with matched normal colon (P>0.001). Increasing CatS was associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS; P = 0.03) among patients treated with surgery alone. Adjuvant FU/FA significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.89) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.81) among 36 patients with high CatS. Treatment did not benefit the 66 patients with low CatS, with a RFS HR of 1.34 (95% CI, 0.60-3.19) and OS HR of 1.33 (95% CI, 0.56-3.15). Interaction between CatS and treatment status was significant for RFS (P = 0.02) and OS (P = 0.04) in a multivariate model adjusted for known prognostic markers. CONCLUSION: These results signify that CatS may be an important prognostic biomarker and predictive of response to adjuvant FU/FA in CRC. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1487-1494. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.408 www.bjcancer.com Published online 11 October 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available