4.7 Article

Detection of circulating tumour cells with a hybrid (epithelial/mesenchymal) phenotype in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages 1338-1341

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.405

Keywords

circulating tumour cells; metastasis; metastatic non-small cell lung cancer; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; ISET

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour cells (CTC) have a crucial role in metastasis formation and can consistently provide information on patient prognosis. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is considered as an essential process in the metastatic cascade, but there is currently very few data demonstrating directly the existence of the EMT process in CTCs. METHODS: CTCs were enriched by blood filtration using ISET (isolation by size of epithelial tumour cells), triply labelled with fluorescent anti-vimentin, anti-pan-keratin antibodies and SYTOX orange nuclear dye, and examined by confocal microscopy in six patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In parallel, CTCs were morphocytologically identified by an experienced cytopathologist. RESULTS: Isolated or clusters of dual CTCs strongly co-expressing vimentin and keratin were evidenced in all patients (range 5-88/5 ml). CTCs expressing only vimentin were detected in three patients, but were less frequent (range 3-15/5 ml). No CTC expressing only keratin was detected. CONCLUSION: We showed for the first time the existence of hybrid CTCs with an epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype in patients with NSCLC. Their characterisation should provide further insight on the significance of EMT in CTCs and on the mechanism of metastasis in patients with NSCLC. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1338-1341. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.405 www.bjcancer.com Published online 4 October 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available