4.7 Article

KRAS mutations detected by the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assays strongly correlate with therapeutic effect of cetuximab

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 403-406

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.247

Keywords

ARMS/S; colorectal cancer; direct sequencing; formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimen; KRAS

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the sensitive and quality-controlled KRAS testing with direct sequencing and to assess the impact on decision making of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed genomic DNA isolated from macrodissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens by direct sequencing and an amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assay (ARMS/S) method. Cetuximab was administered to patients identified as having wild-type (WT) KRAS using direct sequencing. Therapeutic effects were evaluated according to their KRAS status as determined by ARMS/S. RESULTS: Among the 159 patients, the overall mutation rate was determined to be 37.0% by direct sequencing and 44.0% by ARMS/S. For the patients diagnosed as WT by direct sequencing and treated with cetuximab (n = 47), a response rate of 16.0% was observed for 38 ARMS/S WT patients, whereas 9 ARMS/S mutant (MUT) patients failed to respond. The ARMS/S WT patients showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with ARMS/S MUT patients (PFS median 5.0 vs 1.7 months, hazards ratio (HR) 0.29, P = 0.001; OS median 12.1 vs 3.8 months, HR 0.26, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sensitive and quality-controlled KRAS testing may provide improved predictive power to determine the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 403-406. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.247 www.bjcancer.com Published online 5 July 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available