4.7 Article

Auxological changes in UK survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated without cranial irradiation

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 746-749

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.16

Keywords

acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; auxological; body mass index; childhood; late effects; weight

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: As most children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) achieve long-term survival, minimising late effects of treatment is a priority. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia survivors treated historically with protocols including cranial irradiation demonstrate increased weight gain. METHODS: We retrospectively studied all 134 patients treated on the MRC/UKALL97 protocol (without cranial irradiation as standard therapy) at a single centre, with 77 inclusions. Height-, weight- and body mass index (BMI) standard-deviation scores (SDS) were recorded at diagnosis and annually until 3 years out (YO) from end of treatment (EoT); changes across time were explored using a univariate model (significance P <= 0.001 to account for multiple comparisons). RESULTS: Whole-group height SDS was lower from 1 year into treatment until 2 YO, whereas weight-and BMI-SDS remained higher until 3 YO. In females, height-SDS was lower until EoT, but higher weight-and BMI-SDS persisted until 3 YO. In males, height-SDS was lower at EoT and at 2 YO; differences in BMI-SDS had resolved by 2 YO. By WHO criteria, more patients were overweight or obese at 3 YO than at diagnosis (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Survivors of childhood ALL, particularly females, exhibit adverse changes in height-, weight-and BMI-SDS, which arise during treatment and persist into follow-up. Patients should be supported with appropriate dietary and lifestyle advice during ALL treatment and follow-up, which may minimise these changes and reduce associated long-term morbidity. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 104, 746-749. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.16 www.bjcancer.com Published online 15 February 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available