3.8 Article

ECG interpretation skills of South African Emergency Medicine residents

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages 309-314

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s12245-010-0227-3

Keywords

ECG; Interpretation; Education; Teaching; Emergency medicine residents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The use and interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) are widely accepted as an essential core skill in Emergency Medicine. It is imperative that emergency physicians are expert in ECG interpretation when they exit their training programme. Aim It is unknown whether South African Emergency Medicine trainees are getting the necessary skills in ECG interpretation during the training programme. Currently there are no clear criteria to assess emergency physicians' competency in ECG interpretation in South Africa. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study of Emergency Medicine residents and recently qualified emergency physicians was conducted between August 2008 and February 2009 using a focused questionnaire. Results At the time of the study, there were 55 eligible trainees in South Africa. A total of 55 assessments were distributed; 50 were returned (91%) and 49 were fully completed (89%). In this study, we found the overall average score of ECG interpretation was 46.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.5-51.2%]. The junior group had an overall average of 42.2% (95% CI 36.9-47.5%), whereas the senior group managed 52.5% (95% CI 43.4-61.5%). Conclusion In this prospective cross-sectional study of Emergency Medicine residents and recently qualified emergency physicians, we found that there was improvement in the interpretation of ECGs with increased seniority. There exists, however, a low level of accuracy for many of the critical ECG diagnoses. The average score of 46.4% obtained in this study is lower than the scores obtained by other international studies from countries where Emergency Medicine is a well-established speciality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available