4.7 Article

The phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 mediates radiosensitivity in head and neck cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 102, Issue 12, Pages 1778-1785

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605707

Keywords

PTEN; HNSCC; radiosensitivity; locoregional control; EGFR pathway

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: For locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), the recurrence rate after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy is between 20 and 40%, and the 5- year overall survival rate is similar to 50%. Presently, no markers exist to accurately predict treatment outcome. Expression of proteins in the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway has been reported as a prognostic marker in several types of cancer. METHODS: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of proteins in the EGFR pathway in HNSCC. For this purpose, we collected surgically resected tissue of 140 locally advanced head and neck cancer patients, all treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, expression of the phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) was significantly related to worse locoregional control (LRC; HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1-4.6; P = 0.03), independent of lymph node metastases (HR: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.2-27.4; P = 0.03) and extranodal spread (HR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.2- 6.5; P = 0.02). In vitro clonogenic radiosensitivity assays confirmed that overexpression of PTEN resulted in increased radioresistance. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first report showing that expression of PTEN mediates radiosensitivity in vitro and that increased expression in advanced HNSCC predicts worse LRC. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 1778-1785. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605707 www.bjcancer.com Published online 25 May 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available