4.7 Article

Absence of the MGMT protein as well as methylation of the MGMT promoter predict the sensitivity for temozolomide

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages 29-35

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605712

Keywords

MGMT; temozolomide; glioma; prediction

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [VU 2000-2149]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The DNA repair protein O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) can cause resistance to the alkylating drug temozolomide (TMZ). The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the MGMT status, determined by means of several techniques and methods, and the cytotoxic response to TMZ in 11 glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines and 5 human tumour cell lines of other origins. METHODS: Cell survival was analysed by clonogenic assay. The MGMT protein levels were assessed by western blot analysis. The MGMT promoter methylation levels were determined using methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) and quantitative real-time methylation-specific PCR (qMSP). On the basis of the results of these techniques, six GBM cell lines were selected and subjected to bisulphite sequencing. RESULTS: The MGMT protein was detected in all TMZ-resistant cell lines, whereas no MGMT protein could be detected in cell lines that were TMZ sensitive. The MS-MLPA results were able to predict TMZ sensitivity in 9 out of 16 cell lines (56%). The qMSP results matched well with TMZ sensitivity in 11 out of 12 (92%) glioma cell lines. In addition, methylation as detected by bisulphite sequencing seemed to be predictive of TMZ sensitivity in all six cell lines analysed (100%). CONCLUSION: The MGMT protein expression more than MGMT promoter methylation status predicts the response to TMZ in human tumour cell lines. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 29-35. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605712 www.bjcancer.com Published online 1 June 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available