4.7 Article

Improving the yield of circulating tumour cells facilitates molecular characterisation and recognition of discordant HER2 amplification in breast cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 102, Issue 10, Pages 1495-1502

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605676

Keywords

circulating tumour cells; breast cancer; lung cancer; HER2; FISH

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute Lung [SPORE P50CA090578]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH06-1-0303]
  3. twoAM fund (IEK)
  4. Hazel and Samuel Bellin research fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) offer a non-invasive approach to obtain and characterise metastatic tumour cells, but their usefulness has been limited by low CTC yields from conventional isolation methods. METHODS: To improve CTC yields and facilitate their molecular characterisation we compared the Food and Drug Administration-approved CellSearch Epithelial Kit (CEK) to a simplified CTC capture method, CellSearch Profile Kit (CPK), on paired blood samples from patients with metastatic breast (n=75) and lung (n=71) cancer. Molecular markers including Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) were evaluated on CTCs by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and compared to patients' primary and metastatic cancer. RESULTS: The median cell count from patients with breast cancer using the CPK was 117 vs 4 for CEK (P<0.0001). Lung cancer samples were similar; CPK: 145 cells vs CEK: 4 cells (P<0.0001). Recovered CTCs were relatively pure (60-70%) and were evaluable by FISH and immunofluorescence. A total of 10 of 30 (33%) breast cancer patients with HER2-negative primary and metastatic tissue had HER2-amplified CTCs. CONCLUSION: The CPK method provides a high yield of relatively pure CTCs, facilitating their molecular characterisation. Circulating tumour cells obtained using CPK technology demonstrate that significant discordance exists between HER2 amplification of a patient's CTCs and that of the primary and metastatic tumour. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 1495-1502. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605676 www.bjcancer.com (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available