4.7 Article

Effect of alternative temozolomide schedules on glioblastoma O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity and survival

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages 498-504

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605792

Keywords

temozolomide; glioblastoma; O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; xenograft

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression in glioblastoma correlates with temozolomide resistance. Dose-intense temozolomide schedules deplete MGMT activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells; however, no published data exist evaluating the effect of temozolomide schedules on intracranial tumour MGMT activity. METHODS: Human glioblastoma cells (GBM43) with an unmethylated MGMT promoter were implanted intracranially in immunodeficient rodents. Three weeks later, animals received temozolomide 200 mg m(-2) for 5 days (schedule A, standard dose) or 100 mg m(-2) for 21 days (schedule B, dose intense). RESULTS: Tumour MGMT activity was depleted by day 6 in both treatment groups compared with baseline. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity returned to baseline by day 22 in the schedule A group, but remained suppressed in the schedule B group. By day 29, MGMT activity had returned to baseline in both groups. Mean tumour volume was significantly decreased compared with untreated controls with either schedule (P<0.01), although neither schedule was superior (P=0.60). Median survival was 64, 42, and 28 days for schedule A, schedule B, and no drug, respectively (P<0.001 A or B vs control, P=NS A vs B). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-intense temozolomide prolongs tumour MGMT activity depletion compared with standard dosing, however, survival was not improved in this model. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 498-504. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605792 www.bjcancer.com Published online 13 July 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available