4.7 Article

The low-molecular-weight heparin, nadroparin, inhibits tumour angiogenesis in a rodent dorsal skinfold chamber model

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages 837-843

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605535

Keywords

nadroparin; LMWH; angiogenesis; skinfold chamber; intravital microscopy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Recently, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) were found to confer a survival advantage in cancer patients. The mechanism underlying this observation is unclear, but may involve inhibition of tumour angiogenesis. We aimed to examine the effects of nadroparin on tumour angiogenesis using a dorsal skinfold window chamber model in the Syrian hamster. METHODS: AMel-3 and HAP-T1 tumours were grown in donor animals and fragments implanted in the window chambers. Animals (N = 46) were treated with 200 IU of nadroparin or saline for 10 days. Repeated intravital fluorescence microscopy was performed to calculate functional microcirculatory parameters: number (N) and length (L) of microvessels, vascular area fraction (AF), and red blood cell velocity (V). Microvessel density (MVD), fractal dimension, and pericyte coverage were assessed histologically. RESULTS: Active angiogenesis was observed in control animals, resulting in a significant increase in N, L, and AF. In nadroparin-treated animals, however, N and L did not increase whereas AF decreased significantly. Both groups showed an initial increase in V, but nadroparin treatment resulted in an earlier decrease in red blood cell velocity over time. Compared with control animals, nadroparin-treated animals showed a significantly lower MVD and fractal dimension but significantly higher pericyte coverage index (PCI). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that the LMWH nadroparin inhibits tumour angiogenesis and results in microvessel normalisation. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 837-843. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605535 www.bjcancer.com Published online 2 February 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available