4.7 Article

Improving outcome of chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer by docosahexaenoic acid: a phase II trial

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 101, Issue 12, Pages 1978-1985

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605441

Keywords

DHA supplementation; breast cancer chemotherapy; tumour sensitisation; survival; clinical trial

Categories

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Health (PHRC)
  2. INSERM
  3. Tours University Hospital and University Francois Rabelais
  4. Indre-et-Loire of the French League Against Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer becomes lethal when visceral metastases develop. At this stage, anti-cancer treatments aim at relieving symptoms and delaying death without resulting in additional toxicity. On the basis of their differential anti-oxidant defence level, tumour cells can be made more sensitive to chemotherapy than non-tumour cells when membrane lipids are enriched with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a peroxidisable and oxidative-stress-inducing lipid of marine origin. METHODS: This open-label single-arm phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy (response rate), as primary end points, of the addition of 1.8 g DHA daily to an anthracycline-based chemotherapy (FEC) regimen in breast cancer patients (n = 25) with rapidly progressing visceral metastases. The secondary end points were time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The objective response rate was 44%. With a mean follow-up time of 31 months (range 2-96 months), the median TTP was 6 months. Median OS was 22 months and reached 34 months in the sub-population of patients (n = 12) with the highest plasma DHA incorporation. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropaenia (80%). CONCLUSION: DHA during chemotherapy was devoid of adverse side effects and can improve the outcome of chemotherapy when highly incorporated. DHA has a potential to specifically chemosensitise tumours. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 1978-1985. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605441 www.bjcancer.com Published online 17 November 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available