4.7 Article

Serum HE4 concentration differentiates malignant ovarian tumours from ovarian endometriotic cysts

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages 1315-1319

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605011

Keywords

HE4; CA125; endometriosis; ovarian cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation [40343/05, 599/05]
  2. Biotop Oy, Finland
  3. Hormos Medical Ltd, Finland
  4. Genolyze Oy, Finland
  5. The Finnish Medical Foundation
  6. Drug Discovery Graduate School
  7. Graduate School in Computational Biology, Bioinformatics, and Biometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human epididymal secretory protein E4 (HE4, also known as WAP four-disulphide core domain protein 2) is a new promising biomarker for ovarian cancer but its specificity against ovarian endometriotic cysts is only superficially known. We, thus, analysed serum HE4 concentrations together with a tumour marker CA125 in serum samples of women diagnosed with various types of endometriosis, endometrial cancer or ovarian cancer, and in samples from healthy controls. The mean serum concentration of HE4 was significantly higher in serum samples of patients with both endometrial (99.2 pM, P<0.001) and ovarian (1125.4 pM, P<0.001) cancer but not with ovarian endometriomas (46.0 pM) or other types of endometriosis (45.5 pM) as compared with healthy controls (40.5 pM). The serum CA125 concentrations were elevated in patients with ovarian cancer, advanced endometriosis with peritoneal or deep lesions, or ovarian endometriomas, but not in the patients with endometrial cancer. The microarray results revealed that the mRNA expression of the genes encoding HE4 and CA125 reflected the serum protein concentrations. Taken together, measuring both HE4 and CA125 serum concentrations increases the accuracy of ovarian cancer diagnosis and provides valuable information to discriminate ovarian tumours from ovarian endometriotic cysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available