4.7 Article

HPV infection in women with and without cervical cancer in Conakry, Guinea

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 202-208

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605140

Keywords

cervical cancer; human papillomavirus; prevalence; Guinea; Africa

Categories

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA [35537]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer incidence in western Africa is among the highest in the world. METHODS: To investigate human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in Guinea, we obtained cervical specimens from 831 women aged 18-64 years from the general population of the capital Conakry and from 77 locally diagnosed invasive cervical cancers (ICC). Human papillomavirus was detected using a GP5 + /6 + PCR-based assay. RESULTS: Among the general population, the prevalence of cervical abnormalities was 2.6% by visual inspection and 9.5% by liquid-based cytology. Fourteen of 15 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were visual inspection-negative. Human papillomavirus prevalence was 50.8% (32.1% for high-risk types) and relatively constant across all age groups. Being single or reporting >= 3 sexual partners was significantly associated with HPV positivity. HPV16 was the most common type, both among the general population (7.3%) and, notably in ICC (48.6%). HPV45 (18.6%) and HPV18 (14.3%), the next most common types in ICC, were also more common in ICC than in HPV-positive women with normal cytology from the general population. CONCLUSION: The heavy burden of HPV infection and severe cervical lesions in Guinean women calls for new effective interventions. Sixty-three per cent of cervical cancers are theoretically preventable by HPV16/18 vaccines in Guinea; perhaps more if some cross-protection exists with HPV45. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 202-208. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605140 www.bjcancer.com Published online 16 June 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK Epidemiology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available