4.7 Article

Differences in the risk of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus infection by education level

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages 865-870

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605224

Keywords

cervical cancer; human papillomavirus; education; age at first sexual intercourse; age at first pregnancy

Categories

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [35537]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer risk is associated with low education even in an unscreened population, but it is not clear whether human papillomavirus (HPV) infection follows the same pattern. METHODS: Two large multicentric studies (case-control studies of cervical cancer and HPV prevalence survey) including nearly 20 000 women. GP5+/GP6+ PCR was used to detect HPV. RESULTS: Education level was consistently associated with cervical cancer risk (odds ratio (OR) for 0 and 45 years vs 1-5 years 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-1.80 and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.82, respectively, P for trend <0.0001). In contrast, no association emerged between education level and HPV infection in either of the two IARC studies. A majority of the women studied had never had a Pap smear. The association between low education level and cervical cancer was most strongly attenuated by adjustment for age at first sexual intercourse and first pregnancy. Parity and screening history (but not lifetime number of sexual partners, husband's extramarital sexual relationships, and smoking) also seemed to be important confounding factors. CONCLUSION: The excess of cervical cancer found in women with a low socio-economic status seems, therefore, not to be explained by a concomitant excess of HPV prevalence, but rather by early events in a woman's sexually active life that may modify the cancer-causing potential of HPV infection. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 865-870. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605224 www.bjcancer.com Published online 4 August 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available