4.7 Article

Expression of EZH2 and Ki-67 in colorectal cancer and associations with treatment response and prognosis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages 1282-1289

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605333

Keywords

colorectal cancer; adjuvant chemotherapy; prediction of outcome; EZH2; ki-76; immunehistochemistry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) is a member of the Polycomb group of genes that is involved in epigenetic silencing and cell cycle regulation. METHODS: We studied EZH2 expression in 409 patients with colorectal cancer stages II and III. The patients were included in a randomised study, and treated with surgery alone or surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: EZH2 expression was significantly related to increased tumour cell proliferation, as assessed by Ki-67 expression. In colon cancer, strong EZH2 expression (P = 0.041) and high proliferation (>= 40%; P = 0.001) were both associated with better relapse-free survival (RFS). In contrast, no such associations were found among rectal cancers. High Ki-67 staining was associated with improved RFS in colon cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (P 0.001), but not among those who were treated by surgery alone (P = 0.087). In colon cancers stage III, a significant association between RFS and randomisation group was found in patients with high proliferation (P = 0.046), but not in patients with low proliferation (P = 0.26). Multivariate analyses of colon cancers showed that stage III (hazard ratio (HR) 4.00) and high histological grade (HR 1.80) were independent predictors of reduced RFS, whereas high proliferation indicated improved RFS (HR 0.55). CONCLUSION: Strong EZH2 expression and high proliferation are associated features and both indicate improved RFS in colon cancer, but not so in rectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer ( 2009) 101, 1282-1289. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605333 www.bjcancer.com Published online 22 September 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available