4.7 Editorial Material

Do diagnostic delays in cancer matter?

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages S9-S12

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605384

Keywords

diagnosis; symptoms; primary care; delays

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom has poorer cancer outcomes than many other countries due partly to delays in diagnosing symptomatic cancer, leading to more advanced stage at diagnosis. Delays can occur at the level of patients, primary care, systems and secondary care. There is considerable potential for interventions to minimise delays and lead to earlier-stage diagnosis. METHODS: Scoping review of the published studies, with a focus on methodological issues. RESULTS: Trial data in this area are lacking and observational studies often show no association or negative ones. This review offers methodological explanations for these counter-intuitive findings. CONCLUSION: While diagnostic delays do matter, their importance is uncertain and must be determined through more sophisticated methods. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, S9-S12. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605384 www.bjcancer.com (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available