4.7 Article

Predictors of survival and toxicity in patients on adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil for colorectal cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages 1549-1557

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605052

Keywords

fluorouracil; adjuvant therapy; colorectal cancer; pharmacokinetics; pharmacogenetics

Categories

Funding

  1. Regione Veneto [934/02/99]
  2. AIRC Veneto

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aimed at investigating whether the simultaneous evaluation of pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and demographic factors could improve prediction on toxicity and survival in colorectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin therapy. One hundred and thirty consecutive, B2 and C Duke's stage colorectal cancer patients were prospectively enrolled. 5FU pharmacokinetics was evaluated at the first cycle. Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) 5'UTR and 3'UTR polymorphisms and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms were assessed in peripheral leukocytes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to evaluate which variables could predict chemotherapy-induced toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed that: (a) low 5FU clearance was an independent predictive factor for severe toxicity (OR = 7.32; P<0.0001); (b) high-5FU clearance predicted poorer DFS (HR = 1.96; P = 0.041) and OS (HR = 3.37; P = 0.011); (c) advanced age was associated with shorter DFS (HR = 3.34; P = 0.0008) and OS (HR = 2.66; P = 0.024); (d) the C/C genotype of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism was protective against grade 3-4 toxicity (P = 0.040); (e) none of the TYMS polymorphisms could explain 5FU toxicity or clinical outcome. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 100, 1549-1557. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605052 www.bjcancer.com Published online 21 April 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available