4.7 Article

Pemphigus vulgaris antigen mRNA quantification for the staging of sentinel lymph nodes in head and neck cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 181-187

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605470

Keywords

diagnostic accuracy; Pemphigus vulgaris antigen; sentinel lymph nodes; immunohistochemistry; head and neck cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Societe Francaise de Carcinologie Cervico-Faciale
  2. CHRU Montpellier AOI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnosis has been proposed to enhance the intra-operative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node (SLN) invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Although cytokeratin (CK) mRNA quantification with real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR (QRT-PCR) has produced encouraging results, the more discriminating markers remain to be identified. METHODS: Pemphigus vulgaris antigen (PVA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), and CK17 mRNA were quantified using QRT-PCR, and the results were compared with an extensive histopathological examination of the entire SLNs on 78 SLNs harvested from 22 patients with HNSCC. RESULTS: SCCA and CK17 quantification showed significantly higher mRNA values for macrometastases (MAs) than for either negative or isolated tumour cell (ITC) SLNs (P<0.01). Pemphigus vulgaris antigen allowed the discrimination of all MAs and micrometastases from both negative and ITC SLNs (P<0.001). For the neck staging of patients, considering metastatic vs non-metastatic status, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis found areas under the curve of 93.8, 97.9, and 100% for CK17, SCCA, and PVA, respectively. With PVA, a cutoff value of 562 copies per 100 ng of cDNA permitted the correct distinction between patients with positive as opposed to negative neck nodes in all cases. CONCLUSION: PVA seems to be a highly promising marker for accurate intra-operative SLN staging in HNSCC by QRT-PCR. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 102, 181-187. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605470 www.bjcancer.com Published online 8 December 2009 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available