4.7 Article

Clinical application of fluorescence endoscopic imaging using hypericin for the diagnosis of human oral cavity lesions

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 101, Issue 9, Pages 1580-1584

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605357

Keywords

fluorescence diagnosis; endoscopy; image analysis; oral cancer; hypericin

Categories

Funding

  1. National Medical Research Council
  2. SingHealth Foundation, Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of oral cancer is conventionally carried out using white light endoscopy and histopathology of biopsy samples. However, oral tumours are mostly superficial and the lesion and its margins can be difficult to visualise under white light. We present clinical data on fluorescence diagnostic imaging of oral lesions using hypericin, a plant-based photosensitiser. METHODS: Fluorescence images of lesions and normal tissue were captured using an endoscope after hypericin administration. The images were analysed to extract their colour parameters, which, along with the red-to-blue intensity ratios, were analysed and used to discriminate between tissue types. The results were correlated with those from histopathology. RESULTS: The red-to-blue intensity ratio increased from normal to hyperplastic to cancerous tissue and was a good parameter to discriminate between these tissue types, with sensitivity and specificity levels of 90% and above. CONCLUSION: Our results show that hypericin fluorescence imaging has the potential to be used for the clinical diagnosis of oral cancer. Further study to enhance the clinical potential of this technique includes the development of a real-time image processing and analysis system interfaced to the endoscope to enable same-day cancer diagnosis and demarcation of lesion margins in a clinical setting. British Journal of Cancer ( 2009) 101, 1580-1584. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605357 www.bjcancer.com Published online 6 October 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available