4.7 Article

Weekly administration of sagopilone (ZK-EPO), a fully synthetic epothilone, in patients with refractory solid tumours: results of a phase I trial

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages 1241-1247

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605327

Keywords

dose-limiting toxicity; epothilone; maximum tolerated dose; phase I; refractory solid tumours; sagopilone

Categories

Funding

  1. Bayer Schering Pharma AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Epothilones are a novel class of microtubule-stabilising agents, and sagopilone is a fully synthetic epothilone that has shown marked in vivo and in vitro preclinical activity. METHODS: This phase I, open-label study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of weekly sagopilone. Twenty-three patients with malignancy resistant or refractory to standard treatment were enrolled into this study evaluating sagopilone doses from 0.6 to 7.0 mg m(-2). RESULTS: The incidence of drug-related haematological adverse events (AEs) was low, with two grade 3 events observed. Nonhaematological AEs were generally mild and reversible; increased gamma-GT was the only grade 4 event and grade 3 events comprised peripheral neuropathy (n = 2), diarrhoea (n = 1) and fatigue (n = 1). Two grade 3 events were DLTs (diarrhoea and peripheral neuropathy at 7.0 mg m(-2)). The MTD of weekly sagopilone was therefore established as 5.3 mg m(-2). Stable disease was the best overall response (n = 3). Microtubule bundle formation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells increased post-treatment, peaking after 1 h. Sagopilone disposition was similar across treatment courses and showed rapidly decreasing serum concentrations after infusion end and a long terminal disposition phase with no obvious accumulation in the serum, probably reflecting a fast uptake into tissues followed by a slow release. CONCLUSION: Weekly administration of sagopilone could represent an alternative to the 3-weekly administration currently evaluated in phase II trials. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 1241-1247. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605327 www.bjcancer.com Published online 22 September 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available