4.7 Article

Increased tumour dihydroceramide production after Photofrin-PDT alone and improved tumour response after the combination with the ceramide analogue LCL29. Evidence from mouse squamous cell carcinomas

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages 626-632

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604896

Keywords

C6-pyridinium ceramide; dihydroceramide; plasma; PDT; Photofrin; tumour

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA77475]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. US Public Health Service [C06 RR018823]
  4. National Center for Research Resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been proven effective for treatment of several types of cancer. Photodynamic therapy alone, however, attains limited cures with some tumours and there is need for its improved efficacy in such cases. Sphingolipid (SL) analogues can promote tumour response in combination with anticancer drugs. In this study, we used mouse SCCVII squamous cell carcinoma tumours to determine the impact of Photofrin-PDT on the in vivo SL profile and the effect of LCL29, a C6-pyridinium ceramide, on PDT tumour response. Following PDT, the levels of dihydroceramides (DHceramides), in particular C20-DHceramide, were elevated in tumours. Similarly, increases in DHceramides, in addition to C20:1-ceramide, were found in PDT-treated SCCVII cells. These findings indicate the importance of the de novo ceramide pathway in Photofrin-PDT response not only in cells but also in vivo. Notably, co-exposure of SCCVII tumours to Photofrin-PDT and LCL29 led to enhanced tumour response compared with PDT alone. Thus, we show for the first time that Photofrin-PDT has a distinct signature effect on the SL profile in vitro and in vivo, and that the combined treatment advances PDT therapeutic gain, implying translational significance of the combination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available