4.7 Article

High density of FOXP3-positive T cells infiltrating colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 99, Issue 11, Pages 1867-1873

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604756

Keywords

colorectal cancer; microsatellite instability; regulatory T cells; tumour immunity; immune evasion

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in colorectal cancer accounts for about 12% of colorectal cancers and is typically associated with a dense infiltration with cytotoxic CD8-positive lymphocytes. The role of regulatory T cells that may interfere with the host's antitumoural immune response in MSI-H colorectal cancers has not been analysed yet. Using an antibody directed against the regulatory T-cell marker transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), regulatory T cells were examined in 70 colorectal cancers with known MSI status (MSI-H, n = 37; microsatellite stable, n = 33). In MSI-H colorectal cancers, we found a significantly higher intraepithelial infiltration with FOXP3-positive cells (median: 8.5 cells per 0.25 mm(2) vs 3.1 cells per 0.25 mm(2) in microsatellite stable, P < 0.001), and a significantly elevated ratio of intraepithelial to stromal infiltration (0.05 vs 0.01 in microsatellite stable, P < 0.001). CD8-positive cell counts were related positively to the number of FOXP3-positive cells (Spearman's rho = 0.56 and 0.55, respectively). Our results show that the elevated number of CD8-positive lymphocytes found in MSI-H colorectal cancers is paralleled by an enhanced infiltration with CD8-negative FOXP3-positive cells. These data suggest that FOXP3-positive cells may play a role in the regulation of the immune response directed against MSI-H colorectal cancers at the primary tumour site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available