4.7 Article

Development and pilot evaluation of a complex intervention to improve experienced continuity of care in patients with cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 274-280

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604836

Keywords

continuity of care; complex intervention; feasibility trial

Categories

Funding

  1. NHS SDO Programme [SDO/89/2005]
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U122797165] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_U122797165] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High experienced continuity of care in patients with cancer is associated with lower needs for care, better quality of life and better psychological outcomes. We developed and evaluated an intervention to improve experienced continuity. The intervention, consisted of (1) a 17-item patient-completed continuity assessment; (2) feedback to clinical nurse specialists and action to address the needs identified. Multidisciplinary team meetings and oncology outpatient clinics were observed, and patients and staff were interviewed. After qualitative work and reliability testing, the intervention was evaluated in a feasibility trial. Sixty-one patients provided data for analysis. No statistically significant differences were found in patients' experienced continuity between the trial arms, but important trends were seen in measures of needs for care in favour of those receiving the intervention. Feeding back findings from the continuity assessment to clinicians reduced patients' needs for care. Our results indicate that an intervention to target patients' experiences of continuity can reduce their subsequent needs for care. However, overcoming barriers to organisational change and addressing some patients' hesitation to report their continuity difficulties must be considered when implementing such an intervention. A phase III trial targeting patients with inadequate experienced continuity of care is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available