Journal
TERRORISM AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 267-291Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546551003594748
Keywords
assessment; de-radicalization; disengagement; Multi Attribute Utility Technology; prisoner; recidivism; rehabilitation; reintegration; risk reduction; terrorist
Categories
Funding
- National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START)
- Science and Technology directorate of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security [2008-ST-061-ST0004]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Renewed interest on how and why terrorism ends has emerged in parallel with increased visibility of some new and innovative approaches to counterterrorism. These are collectively known, whether for good or bad, as de-radicalization programs.'' However, and despite their popularity, data surrounding even the most basic of facts about these programs remains limited. This article presents an overview of the results of a one-year pilot study of select de-radicalization programs and investigates critical issues surrounding assessment of their effectiveness and outcomes. We argue that Multi Attribute Utility Technology (MAUT) may offer promise for future empirical assessment of what we prefer to designate terrorism risk reduction initiatives.'' Perhaps less obviously, and until more data surrounding the efficacy of such initiatives becomes available, MAUT may also provide a conceptual basis for planning, evaluating, and guiding the development of future such initiatives and may have the unanticipated consequence of facilitating progress by encouraging greater exploration of efforts to change behavior from other contexts.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available