4.6 Article

Rotation thromboelastometry detects thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenaemia during orthotopic liver transplantation

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages 422-428

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq022

Keywords

blood; coagulation; liver; transplantation; measurement techniques; coagulation; thromboelastography; surgery; transplantation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Orthotopic liver transplantation can be associated with haemorrhage, particularly in patients with severe liver dysfunction. We assessed the value of rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM (R)) to monitor coagulation in the operating theatre, its correlation with routine laboratory findings, and its ability to guide platelet (Plt) and fibrinogen (Fg) transfusion. Twenty-three patients were included in this prospective observational study. Laboratory tests and ROTEM (R) tests (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM, and APTEM) were performed six times during the procedure. Correlations between laboratory findings and ROTEM (R) parameters were sought. Thresholds for ROTEM (R) parameters were determined with receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis according to Plt count and Fg levels. Clot amplitude at 10 min (A10) of EXTEM was well correlated with Plt count and Fg levels (R-2=0.46 and 0.52, respectively, P < 0.0001). FIBTEM A10 was correlated with Fg (R-2=0.55, P < 0.0001). ROC analysis showed that EXTEM A10 with a threshold of 29 mm predicted thrombocytopenia with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 60%, and a threshold of 26 mm predicted hypofibrinogenaemia with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 75%. ROTEM (R) is useful for the global assessment of coagulation in the operating theatre. EXTEM was the most informative for assessing the whole coagulation process and A10 showed value in guiding Plt and Fg transfusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available