Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 475-503Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axt039
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
I present a new proof of the likelihood principle that avoids two responses to a well-known proof due to Birnbaum ([1962]). I also respond to arguments that Birnbaum's proof is fallacious, which if correct could be adapted to this new proof. On the other hand, I urge caution in interpreting proofs of the likelihood principle as arguments against the use of frequentist statistical methods.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available