Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit
William H. Greene et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW (2007)
A choice experiment model for beef. What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability
Maria L. Loureiro et al.
FOOD POLICY (2007)
Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: A comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food
Isabell Goldberg et al.
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY (2007)
Consumer benefits of labels and bans on GM foods-choice experiments with Swedish consumers
Fredrik Carlsson et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2007)
Consumer demand for a ban on antibiotic drug use in pork production
Jayson L. Lusk et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2006)
Traceability in the Canadian red meat sector: Do consumers care?
JE Hobbs et al.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE (2005)
The usefulness of experimental auctions in determining consumers' willingness-to-pay for quality-differentiated products
WJ Umberger et al.
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2004)
Consumer preferences for GM food and other attributes of the food system
S James et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2003)
The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice
DA Hensher et al.
TRANSPORTATION (2003)
European consumers' willingness to pay for US beef in experimental auction markets
F Alfnes et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2003)
Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics
F Carlsson et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2003)
Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: Climbing in Scotland
N Hanley et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2002)
Share Paper
