4.6 Article

Competing through operations and supply The role of classic and extended resource-based advantage

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/01443571011082517

Keywords

Resource management; Resource efficiency; Competitive advantage; Food service; United States of America

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The paper seeks to analyze the evolution of competitive advantage using both classic and extended' resource based theory (RBT) The aim is to examine the different ways in which classic and extended resource based advantage develops and how they might combine to create long term advantage Design/methodology/approach - A single case study method is used to examine the process by which competitive advantage has accumulated over a 50 year period at Food Services Group Inc a highly successful food service company based on the West Coast of the USA with an annual growth rate currently running at 10 percent Findings - Preliminary conclusions suggest support for the sequential iterative, and slow cycle development model associated with proprietary bounded resources and the strategic resource rigidity paradox The work also highlights preliminary evidence for a faster cycle development process possible with inter firm resources associated with extended resource based theory (ERBT) and, long run sustainable advantage requiring synchronization and integration of both bounded and relational resources Originality/value - This is the first rich empirical study of the way competitive advantage evolves using both RBT and ERBT The research provides insights into how organizations can combine both classic and extended resources in seeking to establish competitive advantage It illustrates how unbounded external resources such as the role of suppliers engaged in new product development, can create an initial advantage for firms who then build on this by investing in bounded resources such as specific skills within their organization

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available