4.4 Article

Galaxy Formation: a Bayesian Uncertainty Analysis

Journal

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 619-669

Publisher

INT SOC BAYESIAN ANALYSIS
DOI: 10.1214/10-BA524

Keywords

computer models; uncertainty analysis; model discrepancy; history matching; Bayes linear analysis; galaxy formation; galform

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. Durham-University
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E00931X/1, EP/D048893/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/E00931X/1, EP/D048893/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many scientific disciplines complex computer models are used to understand the behaviour of large scale physical systems. An uncertainty analysis of such a computer model known as Galform is presented. Galform models the creation an devolution of approximately one million galaxies from the beginning of the Universe until the current day, an disregarded as a state-of-the-art model within the cosmology community. It requires the specification of many input parameters in order to run the simulation, takes significant time to run, and provides various outputs that can be compared with real world data. A Bayes Linear approach is presented in order to identify the subset of the input space that could give rise to acceptable matches between model output and measured data. This approach takes account of the major sources of uncertainty in a consistent and unified manner, including input parameter uncertainty, function uncertainty, observational error, forcing function uncertainty and structural uncertainty. The approach is known as History Matching, and involves the use of an iterative succession of emulators (stochastic belief specifications detailing beliefs about the Galform function), which are used to cut down the input parameter space. The analysis was successful inproducing a large collection of model evaluations that exhibit good fits to the observed data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available