3.8 Review

Wild-Type MIC Distributions and Epidemiologic Cutoff Values for Fluconazole and Candida: Time for New Clinical Breakpoints?

Journal

CURRENT FUNGAL INFECTION REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 168-174

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12281-010-0022-x

Keywords

Antifungal susceptibility testing; Fluconazole; Epidemiologic cutoff values; Clinical breakpoints; Candida

Funding

  1. Astellas
  2. Merck
  3. Pfizer
  4. Schering-Plough

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida against fluconazole has been standardized by both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Both CLSI and EUCAST have developed clinical breakpoint (CBP) criteria for fluconazole, but these differ in both magnitude and target species. Studies using the EUCAST method have also defined wild-type minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions and epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs or ECOFFs) for the common species of Candida. The ECVs serve as a sensitive means of discriminating wild-type strains from those with acquired resistance mechanisms and include MICs of 1 mu g/mL for C. albicans, 2 mu g/mL for C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis, 32 mu g/mL for C. glabrata, and 128 mu g/mL for C. krusei. Because the CLSI CBPs may be too insensitive to detect emerging resistance among strains of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis, and bisect the WT MIC distribution of C. glabrata, we sought to establish the wildtype MIC distribution and ECVs for fluconazole and Candida spp. The establishment of the wild-type MIC distributions and ECVs for fluconazole using CLSI methods will be useful in resistance surveillance and may prove to be an important step in the development of speciesspecific CBPs for this important antifungal agent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available