4.8 Article

Acoustofluidic Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 87, Issue 24, Pages 12051-12058

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02398

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1 R01 GM112048-01A1, 1R33EB019785-01]
  2. National Science Foundation [IIP-1534645]
  3. Penn State Center for Nanoscale Science (MRSEC) [DMR-1420620]
  4. NHLBI Division of Intramural Research
  5. NSF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selective isolation of cell subpopulations with defined biological characteristics is crucial for many biological studies and clinical applications. In this work, we present the development of an acoustofluidic fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) device that simultaneously performs on-demand, high-throughput, high-resolution cell detection and sorting, integrated onto a single chip. Our acoustofluidic FACS device uses the microfluidic drifting technique to precisely focus cells/particles three dimensionally and achieves a flow of single-file particles/cells as they pass through a laser interrogation region. We then utilize short bursts (1.50 mu s) of standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW) triggered by an electronic feedback system to sort fluorescently labeled particles/cells with desired biological properties. We have demonstrated continuous isolation of fluorescently labeled HeLa cells from unlabeled cells at a throughput of similar to 1200 events/s with a purity reaching 92.3 +/- 3.39%. Furthermore, 99.18% postsort cell viability indicates that our acoustofluidic sorting technique maintains a high integrity of cells. Therefore, our integrated acoustofluidic FACS device is demonstrated to achieve two-way cell sorting with high purity, biocompatibility, and biosafety. We believe that our device has significant potential for use as a low-cost, high-performance, portable, and user-friendly FACS instrument.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available