4.5 Article

Deep learning in omics: a survey and guideline

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 41-57

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/ely030

Keywords

deep learning; neural network; omics; gene; bioinformatics

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2018YFC090002, 2017YFB0202602, 2017YFC1311003, 2016YFC1302500, 2016YFB0200400, 2017YFB0202104]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61772543, U1435222, 61625202, 61272056]
  4. Funds of State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2016B090918122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Omics, such as genomics, transcriptome and proteomics, has been affected by the era of big data. A huge amount of high dimensional and complex structured data has made it no longer applicable for conventional machine learning algorithms. Fortunately, deep learning technology can contribute toward resolving these challenges. There is evidence that deep learning can handle omics data well and resolve omics problems. This survey aims to provide an entry-level guideline for researchers, to understand and use deep learning in order to solve omics problems. We first introduce several deep learning models and then discuss several research areas which have combined omics and deep learning in recent years. In addition, we summarize the general steps involved in using deep learning which have not yet been systematically discussed in the existent literature on this topic. Finally, we compare the features and performance of current mainstream open source deep learning frameworks and present the opportunities and challenges involved in deep learning. This survey will be a good starting point and guideline for omics researchers to understand deep learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available