4.3 Article

A Plan to Facilitate the Early Career Development of Minority Scholars in the Health Sciences

Journal

SOCIAL WORK IN PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 572-590

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19371911003748174

Keywords

Early academic career development; minority health scholars; health disparities research; academic workforce development

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000005] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMHD NIH HHS [P60 MD000207-04, P60 MD-000-207-06, P60 MD000207] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R25 MH060473, P30 MH071944-05, P30 MH071944, R25 MH60473, R25 MH060473-09] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000005] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES [P60MD000207] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R25MH060473, P30MH071944] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The EXPORT Health Project at the Center for Minority Health, University of Pittsburgh, partnered with the Center of Excellence in Minority Health at Jackson State University to design and present a Summer Research Career Development Institute (SRCDI) in 2005 and 2006. The goal of the SRCDI was to enhance the early academic career survival skills of postdoctoral and junior faculty investigators doing research on minority health disparities. Institute organizers seek to increase the number of minority investigators who are successful in securing faculty appointments and independent funding through federal agencies. The Pittsburgh Jackson State University SRCDI admitted a total of 55 (26 in 2005 and 29 in 2006)outstanding postdoctoral fellows and assistant professors from institutions across the United States. Elements of this model can be exported to other institutions to assist minority faculty in achieving their career goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available