4.5 Article

Genomic analysis reveals novel connections between alternative splicing and circadian regulatory networks

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 13-24

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/els052

Keywords

alternative splicing; circadian rhythms; Arabidopsis thaliana; gene expression networks

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
  4. Latin American Guggenheim Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circadian clocks, the molecular devices present in almost all eukaryotic and some prokaryotic organisms, phase biological activities to the most appropriate time of day. These devices are synchronized by the daily cycles of light and temperature, and control hundreds of processes, ranging from gene expression to behavior as well as reproductive development. For a long time, these clocks were considered to operate primarily through regulatory feedback loops that act at the transcriptional level. Recent studies, however, conclusively show that circadian rhythms can persist in the absence of transcription, and it is evident that robust and precise circadian oscillations require multiple regulatory mechanisms operating at the co-/post-transcriptional, translational, post-translational and metabolic levels. Furthermore, these different regulatory loops exhibit strong interactions, which contribute to the synchronization of biological rhythms with environmental changes throughout the day and year. Here, we describe recent advances that highlight the role of alternative splicing (AS) in the operation of circadian networks, focusing on molecular and genomic studies conducted in Arabidopsis thaliana. These studies have also enhanced our understanding of the mechanisms that control AS and of the physiological impact of AS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available