4.7 Article

PCA-based GRS analysis enhances the effectiveness for genetic correlation detection

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 2291-2298

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bby075

Keywords

bioinformatics; principal component analysis; genetic risk score; correlation analysis; complex diseases

Funding

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [81472925, 81673112]
  2. Key projects of international cooperation among governments in scientific and technological innovation [2016YFE0119100]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01AR057049, R01AR059781, P20 GM109036, R01MH107354, R01MH104680, R01GM109068, AR069055, U19 AG055373]
  4. Edward G. Schlieder Endowment fund
  5. Tsai and Kung endowment fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic risk score (GRS, also known as polygenic risk score) analysis is an increasingly popular method for exploring genetic architectures and relationships of complex diseases. However, complex diseases are usually measured by multiple correlated phenotypes. Analyzing each disease phenotype individually is likely to reduce statistical power due to multiple testing correction. In order to conquer the disadvantage, we proposed a principal component analysis (PCA)-based GRS analysis approach. Extensive simulation studies were conducted to compare the performance of PCA-based GRS analysis and traditional GRS analysis approach. Simulation results observed significantly improved performance of PCA-based GRS analysis compared to traditional GRS analysis under various scenarios. For the sake of verification, we also applied both PCA-based GRS analysis and traditional GRS analysis to a real Caucasian genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of bone geometry. Real data analysis results further confirmed the improved performance of PCA-based GRS analysis. Given that GWAS have flourished in the past decades, our approach may help researchers to explore the genetic architectures and relationships of complex diseases or traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available