4.7 Article

Alignment-free genetic sequence comparisons: a review of recent approaches by word analysis

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 890-905

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbt052

Keywords

alignment-free; sequence-alignment; information theory; word-analysis

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources [5P20RR016469]
  2. National Institute for General Medical Science (NIGMS) [8P20GM103427]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern sequencing and genome assembly technologies have provided a wealth of data, which will soon require an analysis by comparison for discovery. Sequence alignment, a fundamental task in bioinformatics research, may be used but with some caveats. Seminal techniques and methods from dynamic programming are proving ineffective for this work owing to their inherent computational expense when processing large amounts of sequence data. These methods are prone to giving misleading information because of genetic recombination, genetic shuffling and other inherent biological events. New approaches from information theory, frequency analysis and data compression are available and provide powerful alternatives to dynamic programming. These new methods are often preferred, as their algorithms are simpler and are not affected by synteny-related problems. In this review, we provide a detailed discussion of computational tools, which stem from alignment-free methods based on statistical analysis from word frequencies. We provide several clear examples to demonstrate applications and the interpretations over several different areas of alignment-free analysis such as base-base correlations, feature frequency profiles, compositional vectors, an improved string composition and the D-2 statistic metric. Additionally, we provide detailed discussion and an example of analysis by Lempel-Ziv techniques from data compression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available