3.8 Article

Relation between counts of periodontopathic bacteria in the tongue coat of healthy subjects and the concentration of volatile sulfur compounds in their breath

Journal

PEDIATRIC DENTAL JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 57-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0917-2394(10)70193-2

Keywords

Gas chromatography; Periodontopathic bacteria; Physiological halitosis; Tongue coats; Volatile sulfur compounds

Funding

  1. Miyata Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The substances that cause physiological halitosis have been found to be mainly volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) [hydrogen sulfide (H2S), methylmercaptan (CH3SH) and dimethylsulfide (CH3)(2)S] produced by putrefaction of anaerobic bacteria. In order to clarify the role of these periodontopathic bacteria in halitosis, we investigated the amounts of four species of bacteria, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in 10 role of the tongue coats of healthy people using quantitative PCR and examined the correlation with the concentrations of VSCs present in the subject's breath (physiological halitosis). The following results were obtained. 1. H2S in the oral breath of the subjects showed a positive correlation with the detected counts of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. intermedia, P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum and the total bacteria. 2. CH3SH in the oral breath of the subjects showed a positive correlation with the detected count of P. gingivalis. 3. (CH3)(2)S in the oral breath of the subjects showed a positive correlation with the detected counts of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. intermedia and total bacteria. 4. The concentrations of VSCs in the oral breath of the subjects showed a positive correlation with the total count of bacteria. These results suggest that periodontopathic bacteria present in the tongue coat of healthy people might be the cause of physiological halitosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available