4.2 Article

Enhancing the role of accountability in promoting the rights of beneficiaries of development NGOs

Journal

ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 451-471

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9995323

Keywords

accountability; downward accountability; non-governmental organisations (NGOs); development aid; rights-based approach to development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper identifies and assesses the extent to which downward accountability mechanisms in non-governmental development organisations (NGDOs) have had the potential in practice to contribute to the effectiveness of rights-based approaches to development The paper draws on evidence gathered from a detailed documentary analysis and a series of in-depth interviews undertaken with senior individuals working in the Irish NGDO sector The analysis indicates variations in practice with regard to the substantive implementation of key downward accountability mechanisms The accountability-in-practice revealed suggests that challenges to substantive implementation have arisen due to insufficient Irish NGDO attention to oversight of downward accountability within locally based partner NGDOs, a reluctance and/or inability to transfer influence to locally based partner NGDOs by allowing them some influence on Irish NGDO governance and strategy, the perceived control of locally based partner NGDOs by local elites who may be distant from, and unrepresentative of, local communities, and a perception that locally based partner NGDOs may not require downward accountability Drawing on these findings, the paper makes some suggestions aimed at helping to transform the rhetorical NGDO commitment to downward accountability into real practices that can contribute substantively to the realisation of the key elements of the rights-based approach to development

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available