Journal
HEALTH
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 57-74Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1363459309347489
Keywords
conversation analysis; general practice; smoking cessation
Funding
- Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007489/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In recent years in the UK there has been a shift towards doctors practising preventative medicine. Research suggests, however, that doctors are more comfortable in their traditional role, and may be reluctant to engage in discussion of lifestyle issues with patients. In this article, we use data from GPs' consultations about smoking, recorded prior to the availability of Nicotine Replacement Therapy on NHS prescription, to demonstrate how they attempt to negotiate behaviour change. Using a discursive analytic approach, and drawing particularly on some of the conversation analytic literature on advice giving, we suggest that there are two kinds of difficulties for doctors to overcome: an ambiguity about the interactional endpoint of a discussion about smoking; and the inability to offer 'expert' medical help. As a result, doctors struggle with following through their advice to stop in terms of talking about how to do it. We suggest that the efficacy of nicotine addiction treatments may be due not only to their clinical effects, but also because their prescription legitimizes the difficulty in stopping reported by most smokers as an appropriate problem for medical treatment. We discuss the implications of these findings for the management of smoking and other lifestyle issues within primary care consultations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available