4.2 Review

Results of the First Austrian Multidisciplinary Expert Panel on Controversies in Local Treatment of Breast Cancer

Journal

BREAST CARE
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 61-66

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000336983

Keywords

Breast cancer: local therapy, surgery, radiotherapy; Expert panel

Funding

  1. Austrian Society of Senology
  2. Austrian Society of Surgical Oncology
  3. Austrian Society of surgery
  4. Austrian society of gynecology and obstetrics
  5. Austrian society of radiation oncology
  6. Austrian society of radiology
  7. Austrian society of plastic, esthetic and reconstructive surgery
  8. Austrian society of pathology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

At the first Austrian multidisciplinary expert panel on controversies in local treatment of breast cancer, 22 experts of all relevant disciplines discussed current areas of debate (surgery of the breast, surgery and pathology of the axilla, reconstructive surgery, radiotherapy, and imaging) in local therapy. The most controversial area of debate was the area of axillary surgery. The panel agreed that it was no longer necessary to perform completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) when micrometastases are diagnosed in the sentinel lymph node. The only prospective trial comparing patients with sentinel node macrometastases with or without completion ALND had to be terminated early due to failure in sufficient patient recruitment. As long as the frequently discussed issues have not been solved and in light of the lack of any clear level 1 evidence, the panel decided not to recommend omitting axillary dissection in patients with 1 or 2 macrometastases meeting the inclusion criteria of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial. The Austrian panel similarly decided not to recommend omitting axillary dissection in patients with macrometastases and low-risk breast cancer in general. These decisions reflect the increasing skepticism of the scientific community against rapidly shifting paradigms without sufficient and clear evidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available