4.5 Review

Physician attitudes about cost consciousness for breast cancer treatment: differences by cancer sub-specialty

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 173, Issue 1, Pages 31-36

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4976-7

Keywords

Cost-consciousness; Financial toxicity; Cancer care costs; Surgeons; Medical oncologists; Radiation oncologists

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01CA163233]
  2. University of Michigan Cancer Center Biostatistics, Analytics and Bioinformatics shared resource [P30CA46592]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries [5NU58DP003862-04/DP003862]
  4. NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program [HHSN261201000140C, HHSN261201000035C, HHSN261201000034C]
  5. NCI [HHSN261201300015I, HHSN26100006]
  6. CDC [5NU58DP003875-04-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeHigh costs of cancer care place considerable burden on patients and society. Despite increasing recognition that providers should play a role in reducing care costs, how physicians across cancer specialties differ in their cost-consciousness has not been reported. We examined cost-consciousness regarding breast cancer care among medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists.MethodsWe identified 514 cancer surgeons, 504 medical oncologists, and 251 radiation oncologists by patient report through the iCanCare study. iCanCare identified newly diagnosed women with breast cancer through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries of Georgia and Los Angeles. We queried providers on three dimensions of cost-consciousness: (1) perceived importance of cost saving for society, patients, practice, and payers; (2) awareness of patient out-of-pocket expenses; and (3) discussion of financial burden.ResultsWe received responses from 376 surgeons (73%), 304 medical oncologists (60%), and 169 radiation oncologists (67%). Overall levels of cost-consciousness were moderate, with scores ranging from 2.5 to 3.0 out of 5. After adjusting for covariates, surgeons had the lowest scores on all three cost-consciousness measures; medical oncologists had the highest scores. Pairwise contrasts showed surgeons had significantly lower scores than medical oncologists for all three measures and significantly lower scores than radiation oncologists for two of the three cost-consciousness variables: importance of cost saving and discussion of financial burden.ConclusionsHow cost-consciousness impacts medical decision-making across specialty and how policy, structural, and behavioral interventions might sensitize providers regarding cost-related matters merit further examination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available