4.2 Editorial Material

Making the Strongest Argument: Reply to Pepperberg (2015)

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages 202-203

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0038721

Keywords

invisible displacement; object permanence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Jaakkola (2014) argued that because the majority of studies of animals' understanding of invisible displacement did not adequately control for the use of alternative lower-level strategies, clear and solid evidence for a conceptual understanding of invisible displacement existed only for great apes. Pepperberg (2015) takes issue with this conclusion with respect to Grey parrots. While I agree that olfactory and social cueing may not be issues of concern for parrots, I reiterate the need for a study that adequately controls for associative learning before we can confidently claim that parrots understand invisible displacement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available