4.5 Article

CD4+T cells inhibit the neu-specific CD8+T-cell exhaustion during the priming phase of immune responses against breast cancer

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 126, Issue 2, Pages 385-394

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0942-8

Keywords

Breast cancer; HER-2/neu; Helpless CD8+T cells; CD4+helper T cells; Memory T cells

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 CA104757, P30CA16059]
  2. VCU Massey Cancer Centre
  3. Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies conducted in animal model of infectious diseases or H-Y antigen model suggest a crucial role for CD4+ T cells in providing help for CD8+ T-cell memory responses. This concept suggests that inclusion of T helper epitopes in vaccine formulation will result in improved CD8+ T-cell responses. Although this concept has been applied to cancer vaccine design, the role of CD4+ T cells in the memory differentiation of CD8+ T cells and retention of their anti-tumor function have never been tested in breast cancer model. Using the FVB mouse model of neu-positive breast carcinoma we report for the first time that helpless T cells showed cytostatic or tumor inhibitory effects during primary tumor challenge whereas, helped T cells showed cytotoxic effects and resulted in complete tumor rejection. Such differential effects, in vivo, were associated with higher frequency of CD8+PD-L1+ and CD8+PD-1+ T cells in animals harboring helpless T cells as well as higher titer of IL-2 in the sera of animals harboring helped T cells. However, depletion of CD4+ T cells did not alter the ability of neu-specific CD8+ T cells to differentiate into memory cells and to retain their effector function against the tumor during recall challenge. These results suggest the inhibitory role of CD4+ T cells on CD8+ T-cell exhaustion without substantial effects on the differentiation of memory T cells during priming phase of the immune responses against breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available